More Risky Business episodes

Risky Business #854 -- We're Jevpilled thumbnail

Risky Business #854 -- We're Jevpilled

Published 23 Sept 2026

Duration: 00:54:49

"Examines AI vulnerabilities, deception risks, and security failures in models like Gemini and OpenAI, critiquing misalignment normalization, implementation flaws, and ethical concerns over exploits."

Episode Description

THE RISKY BUSINESS WEEKLY SHOW IS NOW ON HIATUS FOR TWO WEEKS AND WILL RETURN OCTOBER 14 On this week's show Patrick Gray and James Wilson are joined...

Overview

The podcast discusses various security vulnerabilities and risks associated with AI systems, focusing on how AI agents can be deceived or manipulated. Tools like Thinkst Canary's deception techniques exploit the predictable and often naive behavior of AI agents during network intrusions, making it easier to detect and mislead them. Examples include deploying honey pots such as the "Agent Provocateur" web server, which successfully elicited information from AI agents by mimicking legitimate systems, demonstrating that social engineering tactics - similar to those used on humans - can also be effective against AI.

Several high-profile incidents involving major AI models are examined, including security lapses at OpenAI and Google's Gemini. These include unauthorized access due to token scoping failures, privilege escalation via software bugs (e.g., in Discourse forums), and concerning behaviors like credential reuse or confusion between local and internet environments. The discussion critiques the industry's use of terms like "misalignment" as euphemisms that obscure real design flaws, while also highlighting broader trends such as AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, increasing cybercrime sophistication (e.g., North Korean operations, ransomware groups), and the growing role of deception technologies in defense strategies.

What If

  • What if you weaponized AI agent predictability to detect intrusions early?

    • Move: Deploy a lightweight honeypot service (e.g., fake API endpoint or web server) that logs interactions when AI-driven agents probe your infrastructure. Use open-source tools like Thinkst Canary or build a minimal Flask app with fake credentials.
    • Why Now?: AI agents increasingly follow deterministic patterns and respond to social engineering or breadcrumbs; recent incidents show they readily disclose hostnames, tokens, or commands when prompted - making them easier to trap than human attackers.
    • Expected Upside: Early detection of automated reconnaissance allows you to log attacker TTPs, block malicious IPs preemptively, and strengthen defenses before real systems are targeted - turning low-cost decoys into high-signal alerts.
  • What if you used deception-as-a-feature in your SaaS product to identify automated abuse?

    • Move: Embed honey tokens (fake data entries, invisible endpoints, or dummy OAuth scopes) in your application's response payloads. Monitor access to these resources via logging or synthetic checks to flag bots or rogue AI integrations.
    • Why Now?: With rising AI agent activity and documented cases of models misusing APIs (e.g., OpenAI token leaks), there's growing risk of automated misuse against public-facing services - especially those lacking strict behavioral monitoring.
    • Expected Upside: You gain an early-warning system for scraping, credential misuse, or agentic attacks without blocking legitimate users, while also collecting intelligence on attack vectors to harden your platform.
  • What if you trained your own small decision-focused model to automate security triage instead of relying on large LLMs?

    • Move: Fine-tune a compact model (~100M parameters) on historical incident data (e.g., log anomalies, phishing reports) to classify threats using simple rubrics (e.g., "block," "inspect," "ignore") and integrate it directly into your app or SOC workflow.
    • Why Now?: Smaller models focused on decisions - not text generation - are proving effective for classification tasks (e.g., Jeff the type-safe classifier) and avoid the hallucinations and overhead of larger LLMs, especially in sensitive environments.
    • Expected Upside: Faster, more reliable automated triage with lower compute costs and reduced risk of false actions; enables solo developers to scale security operations without depending on cloud-based, black-box AI services.

Takeaway

  • Implement deception tools like honey tokens or honeypots to detect and mislead automated AI attackers by exploiting their predictable behaviors.
  • Audit and strictly scope API and OAuth tokens in your applications to prevent unauthorized access, especially when integrating third-party services.
  • Run AI models locally on dedicated hardware instead of relying on cloud APIs to maintain control, improve security, and avoid data leakage.
  • Monitor for social engineering risks targeting AI agents by testing how your systems respond to manipulated prompts or fake peer interactions.
  • Deploy simple web beacons or breadcrumbs in sensitive environments to detect agent presence and gather intelligence when unauthorized systems interact with them.

Recent Episodes of Risky Business

22 Jul 2026 Risky Business #845 -- OpenAI's Skynet moment

"AI-powered attack on Hugging Face exploited a zero-day vulnerability, bypassing security measures and highlighting risks of autonomous AI threats, governance gaps, and geopolitical tensions."

24 Jun 2026 Risky Business #843 -- Fortibleed is kinda awesome, actually

A comprehensive overview of cybersecurity threats and defenses, covering credential theft campaigns, SaaS and OAuth vulnerabilities, AI-driven risks, legacy infrastructure weaknesses, quantum policy implications, and strategies for securing IoT, SaaS, and post-quantum transitions.

5 Jun 2026 Soap Box: Detection and response in the AI age

The text explores the growing threat of zero-day exploits and vulnerabilities, emphasizing the need for advanced detection/response strategies, AI-driven automation in SOC tasks, collaborative AI systems for faster threat mitigation, and the evolving balance between AI capabilities and human oversight in security operations.

27 May 2026 Risky Business #839 -- TeamPCP stole GitHub's internal repos

A GitHub breach by "Team PCP" via a compromised VS Code extension exposed 3,800 internal repositories, underscoring supply chain risks, corporate underreporting, AI-driven threats, outdated dependencies, and systemic gaps in open-source and cybersecurity practices.

More Risky Business episodes